First off… I understand ‘underrated’. But that being said; I would like to know(based on the diversity of answers in this thread so far) if people can consider 3 different twists within a similar vein?
-
Underrated
-
Under appreciated
-
Under mentioned
As I said; based on some of the responses; underrated might not be the correct description.
For example; the Draupnir. It is not underrated by the people that own or have thrown one. And it is not under appreciated by those that own or have tried one. But because not that many people actually ‘own’ Draupnirs, it may be ‘under mentioned’.
There are some people that ‘might’ misinterpret under appreciated/mentioned with underrated.
Because a bunch of people may not constantly mention or discuss a certain Yoyo, does not necessarily mean the Yoyo is underrated.
Technically you can only truly underrate a Yoyo if you experienced the Yoyo in motion.
The Hspin NVX is another good example. A responder mentioned he felt the NVX was underrated.
Without taking a poll, I would still have no problem drawing an educated guess that the majority of current active forum members not only do not own NVX yoyos but have never even thrown one and some not even heard of one.
So it can’t be considered ‘underrated’. Few have functional knowledge to give the NVX any rating.
It is simply under mentioned.
If the OP would be willing to lend some Clarity to his specific understanding of ‘underrated’; I think the responses would be more accurate.
I will start with my example.
The SPYY Ti. It is an Amazingly good Titanium Yoyo. But I would not really consider it underrated because not that many people own one.
And because people are under appreciating it, it is under mentioned.
And under mentioned and under appreciated do not resolve into underrated.
Any thoughts?
The ‘rating’ of any specific Yoyo should only be a conclusion based on personal experience with that Yoyo.