Which one is more whippy, long lasting, and overall better?
1 Like
cayce
January 5, 2024, 7:33pm
5
OT fat is fatter than Kitty fat, just so you are aware.
1 Like
Albertino
(Waltz.Romantic)
January 5, 2024, 7:38pm
6
OT fat also for durability, overall better than the Kitty
1 Like
String Saturday! This is an important review but it’s kinda long, sorry about that (ďĽ _ďĽ )
I think this was one of the reviews that I had trouble just working through; everyone knows of kitty, everyone’s used kitty, and professional players who are way more qualified than me die by this string, so anything I have to say about it is going to be understood and critiqued way harder than the other strings. I thought that was a bit scary, but it’s always good for everyone to have a reference for how I…
it’s time!
Original Throw (Fat) || B- (81/100)
[Original Throw String]
Just like any other bulk poly string, there’s bound to be differences in quality control, so take this review with a grain of salt. That being said, this is good. Don’t bind at high or medium rpms or you’re going to get kicked, though. It started to feel more snaggy and weighted near the end of the hour, and to be honest, it got gross faster than I expected. i’m pretty clean, so maybe it was my natural hand moisture? Whips…
here’s two reviews i did on them, there’s way more to string than what you mentioned. if we’re going exactly by your criteria, ot fat is whippier, slightly longer lasting (i say they’re about the same if my memory serves me right), and “better” is always subjective. like cayce said, it IS thicker though. have fun!
1 Like
OT fat should compare to kitty XL
Kitty fat should compare to OT normal
3 Likes
alr, so i didnt order any of those. i ordered ot normal since ot fat i think will be a bit too thick for me.
So glad this was asked. I was wondering the same thing. My kitty string fat supply is low now and I am looking for possible trying OT Fat.