patrickcondon:
yoyomatt2:
patrickcondon:
I like this thread. I’ll contribute only one becasue I’m tired and don’t want to explain three…
Time Travel: Okay kids, lets travel three seconds back in time. Not that big of a deal, right? Wrong. In your journey through time, you have remained still in your reference frame. Meanwhile, during those three seconds, the Earth has been rotating under your feet. You’re not where you were “three” seconds ago. But wait, there’s more! The Earth rotates on it’s axis, while rotating around the sun, while the sun rotates inside our galaxy, while our galaxy mingles in our galactic neighborhood which is careening through space! We aren’t even considering the infentismal wobble casued by our moon! Go back three seconds in time and you’ll most likely end up suffocating in space thousands of miles away from earth. It’s not a tough topic to describe why it WOULDN’T work, but it is hard to think about how we could make it work. And that’s why it WON’T work.
but if you travelled into the future you would end up in space, and try not to suffocate while the earth tries to catch up to you by rotating around the sun. besides, getting past the atmosphere is almost impossible unless you move fast enough, but the impact from that speed would instantly kill you. time travell is just impossibe and thats all i need to know
There would be no impact with the atmosphere becasue essentially you are not moving. You are basically falling out of existence in one point in time and appearing (in our case) three seconds into the future. Lets say we are stanging in front of a brick wall, and when we reappear three seconds later we are behind it. We won’t actually impact the wall becasue 1) we technically didn’t have any velocity, and 2) we technically didn’t exist in the three seconds it took for the brick wall to pass by our location. Making sense?
Also, really the only way we could mess with the ray called “time” we would have to isolate ourselves from all other dimensions. The four dimensions in question are X, Y, Z, and T. There are considered to be more dimensions but I’m only going to focus on the ones humans can percieve. The universe is expanding in all 3 directional dimensions (XYZ) and is “traveling” on a ray called ‘T’, starting at the origin (0,0) and continuing forever towards (0,∞). We would need to isolate ourselves from the movement of XYZ in our universe by traveling through space in the exact opposite direction the universe is expanding. This would make us essentially standing still in terms of existance, but compared to the universe we would be moving. Only once we are isolated in the other three dimensions can we really begin to mess with T, becasue TECHNICALLY we would wind up in the same place, even though the universe has moved. Now keep in mind, in order to isolate ourselves, we have been rocketing away from Earth at an incredible velocity. It only really makes sense to travel into the past becasue we would pop up closer to the Earth (which presumably is where we want to go…). We wouldn’t want to travel to a point in time where the Earth is where we are when we blip, becasue that would be VERY bad (and very hot, not to mention very dead), but we could travel to anytime in the past when we would wind up between where we blipped and where the Earth is, and prehaps a little bit farther if we don’t mind traveling a bit to get back to Earth.
All in all, very very very annoying.
Wow man that’s deep. Anyway:
How yoyoing is a sport.
Scripting.
The difference between a Les Paul and a generic SG looking guitar you buy at ToysRUs.
To elaborate further, we would be further restricted to when we wanted to travel to if we were using a “time machine” to do the traveling, which would be a spaceship, based on what we have previously mentioned. We can only realistically travel to a point in time where/when that machine already existed. That is becasue we are following the laws of time paradox, where the universe is correcting itself when two of something exists. We already solve this issue ourselves becasue we really just fall out of existance and reappear in the past/future. Our nice little ship on the other hand would be destroyed and we would have to find where it was in the time we just arrived in. We can broaden our options by traveling to a time where the ship was being constructed, or when it was a set of blueprints, becasue we could just build the darn thing again.
What’s that, the third reason why time travel is annoying?
dcs937
February 8, 2011, 10:35pm
43
You’re refering to the theory of relativity. Einstein proposed that as an object approaches light speed, time in its frame of reference SLOWS
To elaborate further, we would be further restricted to when we wanted to travel to if we were using a “time machine” to do the traveling, which would be a spaceship, based on what we have previously mentioned. We can only realistically travel to a point in time where/when that machine already existed. That is becasue we are following the laws of time paradox, where the universe is correcting itself when two of something exists. We already solve this issue ourselves becasue we really just fall out of existance and reappear in the past/future. Our nice little ship on the other hand would be destroyed and we would have to find where it was in the time we just arrived in. We can broaden our options by traveling to a time where the ship was being constructed, or when it was a set of blueprints, becasue we could just build the darn thing again.
What’s that, the third reason why time travel is annoying?
What about if there are actual parallel universes/alternative timelines/multiverses or not?
dcs937
February 8, 2011, 11:33pm
44
I don’t think reincarnation is the answer because the population on earth increases by around 2% per year.
If Abby and Brittany Hensel in general and if they had a kid who’s would it be? (Siamese twins that share 1 set of lady parts) I just found out about these girls on youtube…pretty INSANE.
The Universe
How the Hurt Locker won 6 oscars???
JUMP
February 9, 2011, 1:21am
45
Why Jensen Kimmit is world champion of 1a yoyoing.
What’s after death?
and… this one’s pretty hard: http://www.timecube.com/
Multiverse I can deal with, but what process can lead to an entire split in reality and existence? I believe alternate timelines are total bull.
fady
February 9, 2011, 3:34am
47
Kristiawan:
Islamic violence (religion of peace?)
Umm, I’m a moslem, and i think you should learn more.
anyway, for me
QFT
Any who
The Government Commanded All Internet Supplying Companies To Turn It Off
P.S.
“BTW: Time Travel - perfectly real and easily explainable. Go at or near the speed of light for any period of time and you are time-traveling (forward) relative to your starting frame. Only works one way though.”
What Is The One Way ?
DG1
February 9, 2011, 5:17am
48
Where babies come from… to kids
That’s the only one I can think of, TBH.
well, when a mommy and daddy love eachother very, very, much…
dcs937
February 9, 2011, 5:03pm
50
Don’t you have to believe in parallel if you believe in multiverse? :-
This is an accepted version of this page
The multiverse is the hypothetical set of all universes.[a] Together, these universes are presumed to comprise everything that exists: the entirety of space, time, matter, energy, information, and the physical laws and constants that describe them. The different universes within the multiverse are called "parallel universes", "flat universes", "other universes", "alternate universes", "multiple universes", "plane universes", "parent and child universes"...
Well, as of now this thread has become one of the “Most Abstract Things to Explain”
#2 . The size of the universe and if there are more than the one we exist in?#3 . Why the good guy/gal always finishes last?
JUMP
February 9, 2011, 11:19pm
53
fady:
Forgot About 2012 ?!
Because there’s so much debate about it, instead of coming up with my own opinion, I follow a method which gaurentees you won’t look stupid on 2012.
Let people know that you think it won’t end, even if you think it really will.
If it doesn’t end, HAHA! People can’t call you stupid 'cause you were right!
If it does end, there won’t be any people to tell you your stupid. Double win!
fady
February 10, 2011, 3:29am
54
HAHAHA That Made ME Laugh But Really I Would Like A Full Story
Batryn
February 10, 2011, 4:07am
55
Personally, I’d rather live my life than debate about 2012, if it comes, it comes… it’s not like you’re debating about whether to jump in front of a car or anything… you have no control over this.
patrickcondon:
yoyomatt2:
patrickcondon:
I like this thread. I’ll contribute only one becasue I’m tired and don’t want to explain three…
Time Travel: Okay kids, lets travel three seconds back in time. Not that big of a deal, right? Wrong. In your journey through time, you have remained still in your reference frame. Meanwhile, during those three seconds, the Earth has been rotating under your feet. You’re not where you were “three” seconds ago. But wait, there’s more! The Earth rotates on it’s axis, while rotating around the sun, while the sun rotates inside our galaxy, while our galaxy mingles in our galactic neighborhood which is careening through space! We aren’t even considering the infentismal wobble casued by our moon! Go back three seconds in time and you’ll most likely end up suffocating in space thousands of miles away from earth. It’s not a tough topic to describe why it WOULDN’T work, but it is hard to think about how we could make it work. And that’s why it WON’T work.
but if you travelled into the future you would end up in space, and try not to suffocate while the earth tries to catch up to you by rotating around the sun. besides, getting past the atmosphere is almost impossible unless you move fast enough, but the impact from that speed would instantly kill you. time travell is just impossibe and thats all i need to know
There would be no impact with the atmosphere becasue essentially you are not moving. You are basically falling out of existence in one point in time and appearing (in our case) three seconds into the future. Lets say we are stanging in front of a brick wall, and when we reappear three seconds later we are behind it. We won’t actually impact the wall becasue 1) we technically didn’t have any velocity, and 2) we technically didn’t exist in the three seconds it took for the brick wall to pass by our location. Making sense?
Also, really the only way we could mess with the ray called “time” we would have to isolate ourselves from all other dimensions. The four dimensions in question are X, Y, Z, and T. There are considered to be more dimensions but I’m only going to focus on the ones humans can percieve. The universe is expanding in all 3 directional dimensions (XYZ) and is “traveling” on a ray called ‘T’, starting at the origin (0,0) and continuing forever towards (0,∞). We would need to isolate ourselves from the movement of XYZ in our universe by traveling through space in the exact opposite direction the universe is expanding. This would make us essentially standing still in terms of existance, but compared to the universe we would be moving. Only once we are isolated in the other three dimensions can we really begin to mess with T, becasue TECHNICALLY we would wind up in the same place, even though the universe has moved. Now keep in mind, in order to isolate ourselves, we have been rocketing away from Earth at an incredible velocity. It only really makes sense to travel into the past becasue we would pop up closer to the Earth (which presumably is where we want to go…). We wouldn’t want to travel to a point in time where the Earth is where we are when we blip, becasue that would be VERY bad (and very hot, not to mention very dead), but we could travel to anytime in the past when we would wind up between where we blipped and where the Earth is, and prehaps a little bit farther if we don’t mind traveling a bit to get back to Earth.
All in all, very very very annoying.
ahem not to be rude, as I love this kinda stuff, but, Shut up pat!!! lol. I agree with your sig… either way, awesome. You are deep pat.
1.why I love yoyoing.
dcs937
February 10, 2011, 8:02pm
57
Rika-chan:
patrickcondon:
yoyomatt2:
patrickcondon:
I like this thread. I’ll contribute only one becasue I’m tired and don’t want to explain three…
Time Travel: Okay kids, lets travel three seconds back in time. Not that big of a deal, right? Wrong. In your journey through time, you have remained still in your reference frame. Meanwhile, during those three seconds, the Earth has been rotating under your feet. You’re not where you were “three” seconds ago. But wait, there’s more! The Earth rotates on it’s axis, while rotating around the sun, while the sun rotates inside our galaxy, while our galaxy mingles in our galactic neighborhood which is careening through space! We aren’t even considering the infentismal wobble casued by our moon! Go back three seconds in time and you’ll most likely end up suffocating in space thousands of miles away from earth. It’s not a tough topic to describe why it WOULDN’T work, but it is hard to think about how we could make it work. And that’s why it WON’T work.
but if you travelled into the future you would end up in space, and try not to suffocate while the earth tries to catch up to you by rotating around the sun. besides, getting past the atmosphere is almost impossible unless you move fast enough, but the impact from that speed would instantly kill you. time travell is just impossibe and thats all i need to know
There would be no impact with the atmosphere becasue essentially you are not moving. You are basically falling out of existence in one point in time and appearing (in our case) three seconds into the future. Lets say we are stanging in front of a brick wall, and when we reappear three seconds later we are behind it. We won’t actually impact the wall becasue 1) we technically didn’t have any velocity, and 2) we technically didn’t exist in the three seconds it took for the brick wall to pass by our location. Making sense?
Also, really the only way we could mess with the ray called “time” we would have to isolate ourselves from all other dimensions. The four dimensions in question are X, Y, Z, and T. There are considered to be more dimensions but I’m only going to focus on the ones humans can percieve. The universe is expanding in all 3 directional dimensions (XYZ) and is “traveling” on a ray called ‘T’, starting at the origin (0,0) and continuing forever towards (0,∞). We would need to isolate ourselves from the movement of XYZ in our universe by traveling through space in the exact opposite direction the universe is expanding. This would make us essentially standing still in terms of existance, but compared to the universe we would be moving. Only once we are isolated in the other three dimensions can we really begin to mess with T, becasue TECHNICALLY we would wind up in the same place, even though the universe has moved. Now keep in mind, in order to isolate ourselves, we have been rocketing away from Earth at an incredible velocity. It only really makes sense to travel into the past becasue we would pop up closer to the Earth (which presumably is where we want to go…). We wouldn’t want to travel to a point in time where the Earth is where we are when we blip, becasue that would be VERY bad (and very hot, not to mention very dead), but we could travel to anytime in the past when we would wind up between where we blipped and where the Earth is, and prehaps a little bit farther if we don’t mind traveling a bit to get back to Earth.
All in all, very very very annoying.
ahem not to be rude, as I love this kinda stuff, but, Shut up pat!!! lol. I agree with your sig… either way, awesome. You are deep pat.
These are all theories. I’ve also never heard that the universe expands in 1 direction. It would be constantly expanding in all directions. Also these are all in no way necessary to explain because any matter traveling anywhere close to the speed of light would be destroyed.
^Depends on the matter in question. Subatomic matter in general travels at speeds very close to the speed of light, and it doesn’t destroy itself. Now if your talking large space traveling craft then it would need to be able to withstand great ammounts of force the likes of which we haven’t been able to even come close to designing.
I DID say the universe expands in all directions, it does so in the first 3 dimensions XYZ. The last perceivable dimension, time, travels along a ray. Time can only go one direction last I checked.
dcs937
February 12, 2011, 3:42am
60
Buddy_Jim:
^Depends on the matter in question. Subatomic matter in general travels at speeds very close to the speed of light, and it doesn’t destroy itself. Now if your talking large space traveling craft then it would need to be able to withstand great ammounts of force the likes of which we haven’t been able to even come close to designing.
The subject of matter was human space travel. So I was referring to matter based on that. Obviously.
and one of the easiest way o tell u that Islam IS Really The Religion Of Peace Is Samad He Is a Muslim and U Dont See Him Blow Up Him Self In His Yoyo Vids 
