AL7 are the same just denser. The weight is distributed how we want on the 6061 the 7075 just adds a little weight while keeping the weight distributed how we originally wanted.
Criticism is good. Itâs drives me to be better. Depending on what the criticism is, if its an opinion about my product thatâs good. I want to hear peoples honest opinions. Not just hype it up because they own one, which sadly happens a lot in the yoyo world.
I love seeing positive reviews on products. I like to make yoyos I like based on what the community is telling me they want
Any chances G2 will make anything in the undersized range? I know itâs not as popular as it used to be but something in the 50-52mm range that looked similar to the triton would be awesome
Yeah, when you put it that way, it makes sense. I wouldnât change the way my Nessie feels, so thereâs no sense trying to change the distribution just because you can.
Curious, what are your 2 other jobs youâve mentioned?
You have ridiculous time management skills. I do much much less than that, and I struggle to find time to work on my side projects
One more question - do you have any zany/off-the-wall yoyo design ideas that youâd like to test? A few days ago I was thinking of an axle-free yoyo design, where the two halves have super strong magnets in the bearing seat to hold it together. Would solve the issue of axle stripping, though youâd need a fully ceramic bearing for it to work.
Actually, I think that some more extravagant/unique shapes would be good for your lineup. The Albatross and Triton have very simple, organic shapes, and while the Nessie is less so, it is still a fairly simple concept. Some people arenât attracted to shapes like that, so if you did something more dramatic, it could draw those people in. And it would diversify your product line anyways, which is good.
I think the world is ready for some zaniness from Gsquared.
Having just completed my trio of G-squared throws, I can say that the triton and albatross are remarkably different given their very similar specs. Itâs a good way to show how important non-dramatic design changes can be!
So in a way, I agree with Jake; they donât need to go shape-crazy, their designs have enough variety in style. But ultimately, bonkers shapes will get a lot more people looking at G2, if just in a viral âcheck out this mad designâ way, and youâll likely acquire a bunch of converts!
Why not show us the CADs and have us vote on them? =)