This is very subjective. Here are the yoyoâs that I have purchased that I was disappointed with.
Yomega Xodus II: My first yoyo. I learned the absolute basics on the Xodus so it does have a little place in my heart. At the time I didnât know it was for offstring play. For 1A play it is honestly quite awful. Way too big, heavy, and cumbersome.
Duncan Flying Squirrel: Got one just because I felt like a communist for not having a Duncan in my bag. lol. It required alot of tweaks just to get the thing to sleep and return properly. The response is dreadful and slows the yoyo down drastically whenever the yoyo is mounted. I can pull off a few tricks with it, but for the money there are much better options out there.
YYF Pocket Change: I got the Pocket Change because I thought it looked gorgeous. Looks can be very deceiving. The build quality of this yoyo is just dreadful. Both black inner rings cracked in multiple places when i tried to take the yoyo apart. The â8 Pieceâ design is very flawed. The yoyo felt flimsy and cheap when assembled. I decided to glue all of the side pieces together. This definitely made the yoyo feel more solid, and it also allowed me to take it apart easily (without pieces breaking or getting stuck). The yoyo will definitely spin for a long time, but the gap is so small it slows right down when you try to combo. It binds way to easily and grabs when you donât want it to. The only pro of this yoyo is its looks, and for 13 bucks I guess its ok as a pretty little place holder in my bag.
lol I was talking to the guys from one drop (I did a visit to their shop). I mentioned at some point that I only had one of their yo-yos at the time, and they asked what it was. I said it was the dingo, and I swear dave made this face and said âreally? the dingo?â. haha, even its creators werenât that fond. but anyway I liked the dingo, it had a nice feel I just donât like super thin or small throws.
it always bugs me, that âvanillaâ way of thinking that all opinions are good and there is no âgood, bad or betterâ of some given stuff. to me, this is plain wrong.
some throws are manufactured with talent, skill, ideas, love and quality equipment, some others are just manufactured by the thousands to make a quick buck (as much of a buck you can make selling yoyo, which is another debate here)
just as there can be gastronomical cuisine and fast food, music made at a rate of an album a day from studio mercenaries, and music made by extremely skilled and talented people.
there is, indeed, nothing wrong with enjoying bad quality stuff, I just went to Burger King yesterday and loved it, that doesnât make it quality food.
So people enjoy the YWET or the Dingo, and thereâs NOTHING wrong with it, it doesnât make them good throws. The YWETâs ano is awful (LOL @ that denim excuse), the response⌠well, do I really have to say anything about the response? it doesnât mean you couldnât have fun with it, love it and cherish it like your own offspring.
If you have a dumb (not retarded, just an idiot) son, wouldnât you love him anyway? that wonât make him smart, but does it really matter to you?
The thread was about what people would qualify as âbad yoyosâ, to me it means, at a given time (say the throwâs release), the quality (performance, finish, specs, response etcâŚ) could be considered as âbelow averageâ.
The Bape was a great throw when it first got released in 2006 (or so Iâve heard), but if you compare it to todayâs standards, you might just as well throw a $20 free hand zero.
I do respect that copper YWET much more tho (to some extent), because at least you got a great finish for your money.
On the other side of the spectrum, you can have universally acclaimed products, such as the Genesis, the Chief, those are good yoyos, objectively. You may not like them, and itâs completely fine, but that doesnât make them bad throws.
So yes, everyone is entitled to his opinion, but an opinion and an objective assessment of measurable quality (you can tell whether or not the finish is of good quality, you can tell if a given throw spins longer, is more stable than another one etcâŚ) are two different things.
There are some throws, when people ask me for advice, I know if I recommend those throws, the person will be happy with it. Not because I have fun with it and I appreciate it, but because I know that this throw will deliver. When a beginner asks me for his first metal, something cheap, you really canât go wrong with stuff like a DV888 for example. Itâs not the most fun throw out there, but it performs well in all areas, and itâs cheap. itâs a great introduction to metal throws.
On the other hand, I love the ClashCube I just got, itâs an amazing throw, but never on earth would I recommend it to a beginner, itâs extremely small (44mm), has a Dsize bearing, and requires a experienced player with a clean game to really shine. Is it truly a âgoodâ yoyo? I honestly couldnât tell right now (only got it yesterday), the finish is nice, it does perform, but is it up to todayâs standards? I wouldnât give my âassessmentâ quite yet.
Which brings me to my final point; one can only assess the quality if
you spent enough time playing with it
you have a wide field for comparison (i.e. you own or have extensively played an important amount of different products)
which, basically, makes this kind of discussion not very âforum-friendlyâ to begin with
people will just state their favorite or least favorite throws and present them as objectively good or bad
When I played it, I found that in my opinion it just doesnât play like a $120 yoyo or whatever ridiculous price it is. It plays more like a $40 metal. The shape was uncomfortable to me and also I thought the play was atrocious. It just wasnât for me.
I did just think of one that Iâd consider âflat out badâ. The gruntbull Orbis. So bad that they offered to anyone who bought it a discount on the next yo-yo they made. (which I donât think they ever made)