There were some good points made already, and there’s a whole bunch I can talk about, better to talk in person really. And sorry if I’m restating stuff already mentioned, I tried to scan through what was posted already. I just want to throw out some thoughts…
Don’t think judging as just string hits or just elements and variety. They kinda play of of one another. You do get points for string hits, but you obviously won’t score as high doing stuff that looks the same the whole time, that’s where the variety comes in. Pointwhoring isn’t a bad thing if you want to win Top players who know how the system works will play to the rules and win because of it. Doesn’t mean your the best yoyoer either. Just the best at playing the “game” on that given day, under those circumstances. I do have creative ticks I could do in competition but don’t because of lack of speed and points, but right now in my life I have good chances for placing high, and save the experimental stuff for offstage. Do I find competitions less fun because of this? No. Instead of thinking of this as a hinderance, think of it as a challenge. True, not everyone can do it, but as mentioned winning isn’t everything, and players like Guy, Sid, spencer berry, Paul escolar are still well respected for what they do. And for people who think these are the types that should win instead, then that would cause everyone who doesn’t have a smooth creative style to now be the underdog. Judging isn’t perfect, but the people know what’s what, and I think respect goes where it’s deserved regardless if you won worlds or never competed.
Creativity and originality still plays a factor in todays contests as well, as discussed already about John ando. Which leads me to something I hear online at times. Which is, doing the same tricks year after year scores you less points. This is false. Judges are unbiased and don’t reference previous contests. Mickey won 3x in a row cus he was the best. Then yuuki comes back and changes the game, and wins. Then Ando changes it again, and guess who won. Of course there are other factors in play, you can’t just have the concept of the year and win. But if judges see something so amazing and new and you’re racking up points, then you’re on your way to beating the guy who is also racking up points, yet doing those tricks from three years ago.
As for speed, you definitely need it. Ando and Kimmit aren’t the fastest but they make it up in other areas and transition so well that time isn’t wasted. It can definitely be the difference in winning and not because with speed comes more tricks which means more points (and more chances for mess ups too, which is another story…) What if two players technically did everything the same except one person went a little faster and threw in five more tricks without mess up. The faster one wins. Yet again, there are so many variables though. You can be slower and beat a faster person, but speed still plays a role.
I know I may be saying you need speed, pointwhoring, and whatnot, but it doesn’t mean you have to yoyo this way. I’m just stating some things how they are and by no means am saying all this is the correct way to play. There is no correct way and everyone should enjoy yoyoing the way they want. There is a criteria to judging though, and for those that seriously (or maybe not so seriously) want to try and win, there is a way to do it.
Dang, I spent to much time typing…back to practicing for worlds!