Some ‘thoughts/concerns’ on this subject, come up several times a year, but the puzzlingly curiosity prevails, so here we go again…>
There was a time a few years back, when the IRS tried throwing a big wrench into the transmission by suggesting that people making over a certain amount of money on internet transactions would be subject to paying taxes on the capital they generated.
….At the time it seemed somewhat understandable. Seems they are perpetually focused on Squeezing money out of us.
Within the year, they backed off their stance because it wasn’t well thought out and they need time to devise a more idiot proof way to implement their money Sucking plan.
So…. Emergency averted, at least for the near future.
I’ve posted up several articles over the past few years about how the friends and family option was offered as an option to those who actually have friends and family they can trust while making transactions. They never meant it so people could decide ‘everybody’ was either a friend or family member, to skirt around paying fees for goods and services.
I have mentioned on a few occasions that PayPal ‘is’ a for profit money moving business. They are not a non profit. They don’t work for Mother Teresa. They don’t have their headquarters in the North Pole, in Santa’s’ we play for Free Complex.
Making transactions using friends and family, when you aren’t really dealing with friends or family ha no well grounded justification.
Some people say, ‘Well, I think they make enough money off everybody… or make enough off me or they wouldn’t offer that option if they were afraid you would use it, etc…. All Weak statements.
……Go to McDonalds every day to eat. Monday through Saturday… On Sunday, tell the Manager that you think they have med enough money off you during the week. Tell the Manager you should be considered ‘a friend or family member’ and you want to eat for Free. < Get back to me on how that works?
….Just about every day, I check out the forum to see who is sell what and who is looking for what and whatever else there is to see. By now, most people that frequent this forum know that if a deal goes bad and you used F&F, you are sucking eggs because that option offers no PayPal support with that option.
I understand that All yo-yo sales transactions aren’t several hundred dollar Titanium yo-yos. But the PayPal fees for insured transactions are/can be dirt cheap considering some amounts. $3 on a hundred and at least you can file for a refund if your deal goes Sour.
With as many times as this Horse has been slapped around, every day I check the board, I see sellers clearly stating F&F ‘only’. And some of the sellers have only been forum members for a few months with no real transaction history.
Why don’t the sellers just factor the goods and services fees into their selling price?
Why do the sellers feel justified in suggesting their potential buyers make deals with no insurance of completion?
What compels a seller to feel comfortable with using the convenience of PayPal, yet not willing to ‘PAY’ their fees for using their Services?
I have given this subject considerable thought. I can see no logical or reasonable justification in taking the position of, ‘I will use PayPal, but I will deliberately disregard the PayPal Conditions of Use.
Bottom line is simple> You make a transaction using PayPal, if you are dealing with friends and family, then by all means use the friends and family option.
If you are making a transaction using PayPal and you are not friends or family, then use goods and services.
No rocket science here. A simple and basic concept. Work within the rules.
PS…. Saturday today. Most excellent. Just one day left before I talk to the Manager at McDonalds for my free meal. Uh…. I’m friends and family, right?