Wow! Shipping was super fast! Thanks YYE.
I got the red and the color is more of a burgandy. This thing play so nice.
6 Likes
Fingerspins are not a primary consideration of the design. If you can fingerspin well you can definitely fingerspin with it but if thatās a primary consideration. I could recommend other yoyos that give up something else to give a better fingerspin experience.
7 Likes
Thanks for answering my question Ben 
I see so it was not a primary design Choice for finger spins but instead for performance which looks amazing 
P.S congrats on the win Ben 
!!!
2 Likes
Picked up an IQ yesterday! Super stoked to try it out based on how much Ben loves it. Hard not to trust his opinion too since heās tried/created more throws than Iāve ever had.
@yyfben2.deactivated curious to know what it looks like under the SS ring? Any pics of it without them?
8 Likes
Iq definitely looks fireeeee
5 Likes
Wiffle ball light. I donāt have a physical cut pic nor really want to share the cad but you can kinda tell looking that The weight is mostly in that inside corner of the ring. The width in the ring gives it the look but itās mostly in the inner.
4 Likes
I am not sure that I understand this description. Can you explain?
smart yo for smart pros
9 Likes
Now I am even more confusedā¦But OK.
1 Like
Iām guessing the terminology is whatās throwing you off, particularly the word ārequrementsā.
A requrement is similar to a requirement, but specifically denotes team competitors. There is no āIā in requrement.
Ivan
6 Likes
The whole statement seems awkward.
Maybe something like: The IQ checks all the boxes in current yo-yo trends.
1 Like
Hereās how I read it: Itās made for players (like Gentry) who are intelligently able to identify the tricks that get āclicksā from judges at contests, and thus a higher final score. Basically, this is a yoyo that handles pretty much anything the highest level, or āhighest trick IQā players can throw at it.
I thought it was good marketing.
5 Likes
Oh; I see. I guess I have never equated I.Q. with being ācleverā. Was Einstein ācleverā?
ā¦ But we digress.
I have tried out the I.Q. and it is indeed a superior performer. I am still in the early stages of playing it; but it has been nothing but a joy so far. YYF really knocked this one out of the park.
2 Likes
I was just joking around, I didnāt write it. Thatās copy from YYF I think.
2 Likes
You answered @Yoyogeek15 , but you didnāt really answer @craZivn. How does it compare? I understand itās not a primary consideration.
I find both the Shutter and Shutter Wide Angle to be very capable for fingerspins.
Sorry Iām late to the game, somehow I missed this one.
1 Like
I have a JDS Shutter now so I can answer my own question! The JDSās cup is larger diameter and (I think) shallower than the Wangle but I still find fingerspins to be quite nice on it. Maybe not as stable as the Wangle on the spin, but easier to hit the fingerspin cup for tyros like me, since the cup occupies more real estate.
Ivan
5 Likes
Iāve been working on finger spins with my iQ, and even though it might not be a consideration, I find it does a fantastic job with them. Iām also using a Speedaholic XX which is probably the best FS throw Iāve ever used, so Iāll compare them for you.
The Speedaholic feels almost like itās on a rod, and you just have to stand there holding it. Ultra smooth and doesnāt move around at all once youāre in the dimple. Easy.
The iQ revolves around your finger tip since thereās a nipple in the middle of the cup. The glossy finish keeps everything smooth, and due to the extreme stability the rings give it, itās also very easy, just a ādifferentā spin.
Between the two, I find it easier to get into (and out of) a spin with the iQ, but the Speedaholic sets in better once youāre in the dimple. And I say this from a just starting out stance where I can land it about 50%, maybe less, of the time. Bottom line, the iQ wonāt disappoint you on finger spins!
3 Likes