He was talking about how binds are affected by loss of spin. I’m saying that a good stiff regen can give a quick little acceleration boost for a decent return.
My personal opinion, even though I don’t reach for them very often, is that a responsive bearing yo-yo can be great for cleaning up your technique. This isn’t necessarily specific to slim bodied designs, but kinda expanding on my half-joking comment earlier, you can’t be sloppy. If you can pull it off on a responsive yo-yo, odds are you’ll be smooth as silk on an unresponsive. I guess it kinda takes some of the fun out of it if you just look at it as a training tool, but I think there’s validity to it. And yeah I know there are some animals out there who can hit rancid milk with a wooden fixie but the bearing responsive gives mere mortals the same tools.
Edit: All that being said, I love my wooden yo-yos, but I don’t really try to replicate my “regular” 1a play with them. For me, it’s just about changing it up, looking at things a different way. And for what I personally want out of fixed play, I feel like wood is the best option.
From what I’m reading, there is no compelling reason to choose a modern slimline over a fixed axle for general responsive play.
However, it seems like if I want the option to combine responsive with unresponsive, they have something to offer there.
They’re just different.
Metal responsive yo-yo’s (the ones I use) are often MORE responsive than their fixed axle counterparts. This means they wind tighter and regen with a bit more power. Stop n Go’s have more juice and stalls tend to land a bit tighter. Also because of the density, the center of mass feels different during flip tricks, etc. Pull starts are easier, Tape Measures are more consistent. So it requires a different approach to the same tricks in some ways (and I tend to find myself doing different tricks, albeit within the same basic style).
I don’t think one or the other is better. I think I’ll always see wood as “home”, but I do think some of the new slim metals out there now make the transition quite a bit easier and enable some new directions of their own. That said, it would be wrong just to look at responsive metals as if they’re training wheels for wood.
For me, responsive metal helps me more with unresponsive metal. I do the same kinds of tricks on both. Wood is a different approach altogether for me. It’s all personal preference, I know, but I just have no desire to do long 1a tricks on a wood yoyo. Stalls, regens, flips… that’s where it’s at
True, I have beat a few pretty bad I guess, they all get this kinda chewed up look that doesn’t feel good in the hand
When I mentioned long combos, I didn’t mean unresponsive tricks. I just meant longer string tricks can be combined with quick return tricks, something that is more difficult with wood. Indeed, when I mentioned a strong flyaway return/dismount it was my way of saying what Ed said about metals often being more responsive due to synthetic response materials.
I strongly disagree with that statement. A tug responsive yoyo should not need a bind to return. Binds originated so that unresponsive yoyos could be rewound. If it’s not tug responsive, it’s not a responsive yoyo.
When I say bind in that context I mean a responsive tug bind, because we are talking about responsive YoYos, per the title and first post text.
Try tugging on a suuuper slowly spinning responsive yoyo to see what I mean. The faster you lose that spin, the worse the tug bind is gonna be.
I can’t bind a super slowly spinning unresponsive yoyo either. For me at least that problem spans the responsive/unresponsive boundary, so the problem isn’t exclusive to responsives, slimline or otherwise.
A bind is the antithesis of a responsive yoyo. In my limited experience, one cannot get a super slowly spinning yoyo of any type to return reliably with a bind or a tug.
There’s a final 2018 sale on b-grade Confusions for 20 bucks at the YYF website, I highly recommend this yo-yo!
Sound good, but I don’t even hvae the $20 to spare, really.
Went for the confusion, left with the dogma
How do you like the Dogma?
@codinghorror sent me one a couple of months ago when I first joined up here, and I have to say it is a great yoyo that seems to get absolutely no attention or recognition. It’s not flashy, and doesn’t look like an advanced design or anything, but it sure does play well. A real solid performer.
Oh I literally just put the order in lol, don’t have it yet. But I feel like it’ll be a good fit for me. When @codinghorror mentioned the sale I checked it out and just couldn’t pass on the dogma. I like TP throws but they have always gotten hate because of their pricing, or maybe not hate necessarily but reluctance to purchase. I think their mono metals are awesome. I’m sure the bimetals are great too I just haven’t tried one
Edit: yeah I always think that’s a cool feeling when you kinda stumble upon a yo-yo that’s been flying under the radar but you try it and love it.
TP? (I’m confused cuz the Confusion and Dogma are both YYF throws…)
Turning Point. The dogma was a YYF x TP yo-yo and from what I’ve read it plays a lot like a turning point
Now that you have a Bolt2, maybe you can explain it to us … just put in a slim C bearing and it’s pretty close to a Confusion in my book, though technically a fair bit wider, it’s not wide at all by modern unresponsive standards!
I tried it as a responsive and I really wanted to like it, but I didn’t.
It was plenty responsive enough, but it just felt far too hard hitting for various stalls. Even when I throw it as lightly as I can, it just generates too much spin for me to comfortably perform modern responsive tricks. Perhaps it wasn’t intended to be used for these kinds of tricks.
I don’t see how it could possibly play anything like a Confusion… The shape is far different, the weight is far different, the weight distribution is far different and it uses a C slim bearing instead of an A bearing… I would imagine the Confusion would play a lot friendlier for stall tricks than the Bolt2.