Vs. Newton YoYo Concepts: Andrew Maider wins MA States!

I believe that statement was what we call misleading.

I think he meant this is the part of the second auction. The firts one was spent

I can say in no uncertain terms that the donation pictured in this thread is the only one made.

Iā€™m not certain why he called it a ā€œsecondā€.

And yes, a loan or some other quick form of restitution should be done.

Iā€™m confused,
He said he was waiting on someone to make the second donation, which we can see he made. But doesnā€™t that mean he still owes $4300, not $3000, for the first donation?

$4300.00 was the grand total. $1150.00 was donated. That leaves a little over $3000.00 that is yet to be donated.

In that case Vega, i retract my statement and no longer have any grace to give the man. Break out the plastic or go sell plasma

1 Like

The receipt also says ā€œone time giftā€. If it was an ongoing donation, it would say so.

Locked to preserve all of this as evidence.

Please feel free to continue here: Vs. Newton Charity Issues

Summary for those who havenā€™t read the whole thread:

  1. 2 years ago Heath organized a charity auction for the American Cancer Society
  2. People donated yoyos to be anodized and auctioned for this charity - all the money raised through eBay auctions was to be donated to the ACS
  3. Instead of donating the money, Heath stole it and spent it on undisclosed personal things
  4. Heath then lied for months and months about it
  5. Heath finally admitted guilt, but in a weak and ambiguous way, after donating $1150 out of $4300 raised
  6. Heath still owes $3150 to the ACS.
5 Likes