- 1 to 1: July 2019
- No Official Quote
- Organic- Yes/No/Maybe stretched O crossed with a flattened V?
- false rim/middle weight bump- Yes
- Wide /Diameter Ratio =100%
- Width: 53 mm
- Diameter: 53 mmf
- Rev: November 2019
- “The design itself is based on a Top Deck so you’ll notice it has a similar profile shape, but don’t be fooled, the weight distribution and cup are changed radically and it plays like a totally different beast.” -One Drop
- Organic- Yes
- false rim/middle weight bump- No
- Wide /Diameter Ratio =79.07%
- Width: 44.6 mm
- Diameter: 56.4 mm
- Silhouette: March 2020
- Quote? No
- Organic? No, W shaped
- false rim/middle weight bump? Barely
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 72.31%
- Width: 41.5 mm
- Diameter: 56.7 mm
- Halifax: July 2020
- Quote nope
- Organic? No, H Shaped
- false rim/middle weight bump? yep
- Wide /Diameter Ratio =76.58%
- Width: 39.9 mm
- Diameter: 52.1 mm
- Free Solo: December 2020
[
- No Quote (actually this is in yoyoexpert, but I won’t add it due to unknown origin)
- Organic? Nah, W shaped
- false rim/middle weight bump? Yes
- Wide /Diameter Ratio =82.73%
- Width: 46.0 mm
- Diameter: 55.6 mm
- Thorn: August 2022
- Quote? Nope
- Organic? Nope V shaped
- false rim/middle weight bump? Seems like it
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 74.95%
- Width: 42.55 mm
- Diameter: 56.77 mm
- Wyvern: December 2022
- “The Wyvern as a whole is an amalgamation of yo-yos, games, and art that I hold near and dear to me. This yoyo takes inspiration from some of my all time favorite onedrops: the OG Project, the Summit, and the Sugar Glider.” -One Drop/Andrew Daugherty
- Organic? No v/w shaped
- false rim/middle weight bump? Slight/ not really, it’s practically in the rim
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 82.31%
- Width: 46.00 mm
- Diameter: 55.88 mm
- Booster Wyvern: October 2024
- No Quote
- Organic? No. V/W shaped
- false rim/middle weight bump? Slight/ not really, it’s practically in the rim.
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 82.31%
- Width: 46.00 mm
- Diameter: 55.88 mm
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 82.31%
- Perspective: July 2024
- No Quote
- Organic? Yes/No, both? O/W shaped.
- false rim/middle weight bump? Slight? Not sure. Maybe not.
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 78.00%
- Width: 42.9 mm
- Diameter: 55 mm
- Rainier: December 2024
- This yo-yo started as a simple idea: What if we took a Cascade, scaled it up and shifted all the weight to the rims? … we scaled up the diameter to 56.4mm and the width scaled up to 48.4mm in keeping the same proportions as the Cascade…" - One Drop
- Organic? Yes
- false rim/middle weight bump? No
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 85.81%
- Width: 48.4 mm
- Diameter: 56.4 mm
- Boosted Rainier: May 2025
- “The Rainier started with the idea of scaling up a Cascade…” -One Drop
- Organic? Yes
- false rim/middle weight bump? No
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 85.81%
- Width: 48.4 mm
- Diameter: 56.4 mm
- Markmont Blunderbuss: June 2025
- “..We originally incorporated the Cascade yoyo “bump” in the halves cup area, to add mid-weight for improved spin time and stability… like the true to form artisan he is, Shawn whipped up another 3 prototypes with the most saucy and original cup “wave” I’ve seen
” - Mark Mont - Organic? Yes, O/V
- false rim/middle weight bump? Slight, only known of due to MM’s post
- Wide /Diameter Ratio = 84.46%
- Width: 47.3 mm
- Diameter: 56 mm
Observations from the Cascade Super Comparison:
-
Objective (Observable truth, best evidence):
- Quotes that mention the Cascade
- 8/24 Explicitly say Cascade was influence
- 3/24 Say they were influenced by one (or more) yoyo that was influenced by the Cascade (weakish evidence)
- 1/24 says the feel is familiar (weak evidence)
- Quotes that mention the Cascade
-
Subjective (Opinions, weakest evidence):
- Semi Organic but curved to a curved/flattish palm catch
- O 9/22
- W 4/22
- V 9/22
- Didn’t know how to classify 1 to 1 and perspective, so I left them out.
- Semi Organic but curved to a curved/flattish palm catch
-
false rim/middle weight bump inside (obvious mid rim weight?)
- Obvious/visually confirmed/quote noted it
- 16/24
- Subtle/barely
- 5/24
- None Observed
- 3/24
- Obvious/visually confirmed/quote noted it
-
Wideish
- “On average these days, the width tends to be 70% - 80% of the diameter. A very average example is the SK at 75%. On the wide side, the Sugar Glider comes in at 84%. And on the narrow end, the Deep State is 50%.” -One Drop on the 1 to 1, 2019
- 83% or greater= 9/24
- 80-82.99%= 5/24
- 79 and below = 10/24
- “On average these days, the width tends to be 70% - 80% of the diameter. A very average example is the SK at 75%. On the wide side, the Sugar Glider comes in at 84%. And on the narrow end, the Deep State is 50%.” -One Drop on the 1 to 1, 2019
Spreadsheet of Above Data:
Conclusion:
- 8 are explicitly influenced by the Cascade due to the quotes in the yoyo description
- The best subjective influence, in my opinion, is the false rim/middle weight bump, which 21/24 have this feature. The 3 that don’t are the Rainier, the Boosted Rainier, and the Rev. However, both Rainiers explicitly say they are from the Cascade.
- Of the ones that don’t explicitly say they were influenced, 4 (to me) look Cascade-ish be being organic, wide, and having the midweight step
- The last 12 outside of the 1 and 3rd bullet point above have very little evidence (only 1-2 subjective points) that keep me from concluding they are heavily influenced by the Cascade.
Yoyos that might be similar still, but slipped my mind: 2016 Benchmarks(V, H, W), T1 20/20, and the Rev2. All 4 the yoyos have connections to other yoyos in here, so they might have some small similarities also with the Cascade.
Finally, I think I need to say that in no way am I saying that these yoyos play the same. The more I read about designing yoyos and weight distribution, the more I know that it’s pretty hard to determine how yoyos feel in comparison to each other. I know so little about this, these are just speculations of a layperson who knows a handful of yoyo tricks and looks at pictures of yoyos.

























