it also ignores the greater anodic propensity of 6061ā¦ but only because this has yet to be discovered.
Itās also worth considering the āknuckle impact factorā. 7075, being denser than 6061, has a higher KIF. I havenāt quantified this, and itās solely based on personal anecdotal evidence, but I suspect the density prevents as much vibration throughout the yoyo when it strikes something, so more energy is transferred into the struck object and less is absorbed through vibration.
Test it by punching aluminum ingots. I would also like to submit an alternate measure of Fingertip Impact Factor. Knuckles are indeed a victim of yoyo impacts but they are more sufficiently hardened against impact than fingertips. I feel the rare fingertip impact will yield more precise data due to less hardening.
Funny you say that as Iām a metallurgist for an auto supplierās R&D center. Unfortunately I almost exclusively deal in hardenable steels.
But you got me wondering, so I looked it up.
Hardness of 7075: 150 on the Brinell scale (500g load, 10mm ball) which is about 175 on the Vickers scale.
Hardness of 6061: 95 on the Brinell scale, which is about 105 on the Vickers scale
So 7075 is significantly harder than 6061. I figured as much, but I didnāt expect there to be such a large difference.
Funny you say unfortunately when I think thatās awesome. Very fitting job for also having a hobby where the items in said hobby are almost exclusively made of those materials when they are metallic. Granted itās also probably stupidly hard labor too
Interesting idea and while there may be some amount of energy thatās lost to vibration (and heat) I think the ouch factor is mostly just (mass x acceleration) / area.
Itād make sense that thatās the most dominating factor. But I believe that hardness, toughness, and elasticity likely play a small part.
Density and elasticity especially. I would rather be hit by 63 g of styrofoam than 63 of aluminum
This isnāt my science homework but it could be if I wanted it to be