So I got a ratty old FHZ in a trade a while back. Decided last night that I wanted to make it fixed axle, so I turned a nice walnut axle for it.
I have it all set up and it’s pretty sweet, surprisingly, but it’s still too unresponsive. The response looks like it is flowable silicon - definitely silicon though, and it’s recessed a bit.
Well, I already have significantly shortened the axle… The gap is only .1" which is what most fixed axle woodies are set at. I also have a fatter than normal string. If I go any narrower I won’t be able to pull off much in the way of tricks.
I definitely need to come up with a stickier response.
I can do that. What should I replace it with? The current response is really good when I have the bearing and a poly string in it to play unresponsive. Binds like a champ. Seems like just replacing a good response with a new response isn’t really getting to the heart of the issue. I’m thinking I need a different type of response?
Yeah, it’s .125 (1/8") Its the narrowest chisel I have. I have the same axle/groove on my wooden home made throws and they all perform well. of course they also have a single Duncan response pad on them. The problem with the FHZ is that the current response is recessed, so I can’t just put a response pad on the FHZ. I need to come up with another response solution I guess.
Unresponsive or slippy? these are two different things that many people seem to miss.
Unresponsive → string not rolling or don’t roll enough when you tug it up.
Slippy → string rolls when tug up, but it doesn’t grab/lose grip.
If it’s unresponsive, try using different string, different wood, make the groove on the wood bigger (diameter).
If it’s slippy, it’s the response pad.