# Why is "H" shape relatively uncommon today?

**URL:** <https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332>\
**Category:** General Yo-Yo\
**Created:** [May 15, 2019, 2:16am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332 "2019-05-15T02:16:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 2:54pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/41 "2019-05-15T14:54:04Z")

</div>

> [@YoYoExpertGarrett](#):
>
> OD makes H-shape yo-yos

Ok, then what H shape yo-yos do they make? :thinking:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smileypants707](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/smileypants707/32/19045_2.png) [@smileypants707](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/smileypants707)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 2:58pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/42 "2019-05-15T14:58:19Z")

</div>

> [@YoYoExpertGarrett](#):
>
> just saying these things doesn’t make them law.

 ![Screenshot_20190515-075722_Chrome](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/0/f/1/0f1817219ee72f6ac031356cb0b819f47a6151e8.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 3:03pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/43 "2019-05-15T15:03:52Z")

</div>

It is interesting to look at the evolution of the benchmarks

## 2013

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/0/b/5/0b564fb52915fb1640903c27e6db162d7e8b62e0.jpeg)

W, O, and V/H

## 2014

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/1/4/5/14599fb1d7c7f5f75c71643bed6d99320cc880de.jpeg)

W, H, O, V

## 2016

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/8/1/4/814b6a123625d2e3788bc5a1614d3375637d7b21.jpeg)

W, H, O, V

The H is by far the least “there” of the shapes, in 2013 it was merged with the V, in 2014 it looks like a slightly different W, in 2016 it’s… kinda the same lack of differentiation. OD just doesn’t _do_ H shapes, for the most part.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YoYoExpertGarrett](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/yoyoexpertgarrett/32/1543_2.png) [@YoYoExpertGarrett](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/YoYoExpertGarrett)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 3:13pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/44 "2019-05-15T15:13:21Z")

</div>

Your basing **your** classification for H-shape on a definition **you** created. Shouldn’t the fact that it was called H-shape and accepted as H-shape in 2013 be enough to make it an H-shape?

Have you considered the possibility that the definition you created on your own in 2019 is a little flawed. Ya know… since you’re blatantly ignoring what everyone considered an H-shape in the past.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 3:17pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/45 "2019-05-15T15:17:59Z")

</div>

I’m mostly basing this on differentiation, /eg/ how different is the shape from its siblings? I would argue pure V, pure O, pure W are quite different in _feel_, in _play_, even visually (see the above pics of the benchmarks for 2013, 2014, 2016).

I could see calling H a “bell” shape I guess, if we want to define H as the Genesis. But I think **the iYoYo version of the H definition** better captures an actual _difference_ across all three axes: feel, play, look.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronW](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/aaronw/32/49251_2.png) [@AaronW](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/AaronW)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 3:25pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/46 "2019-05-15T15:25:20Z")

</div>

H shape has always been a distinct step from the rim. Just like all of One Drop’s H shapes (which I stated earlier), and all the other H shapes that have been on the market. That has always been what defined an H shape. Bell shapes came in later, they’re really their own distinct shape, if we’re getting technical about it. Again, the iYoyo you posted earlier has no distinct step, therefore (again technically speaking) is not an H shape yoyo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 3:32pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/47 "2019-05-15T15:32:20Z")

</div>

> [@AaronW](#):
>
> Again, the iYoyo you posted earlier has no distinct step, therefore (again technically speaking) is not an H shape yoyo.

:thinking:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/b/4/c/b4cab4c291da2036d70dc8c444e034efe118bd5c.jpeg)

I agree this boils down to “old school Genesis definition of H” versus “new school iYoYo definition of H”. Despite @YoYoExpertGarrett’s claims to the contrary, I did not make this up :wink:

I am absolutely firmly in the iYoYo camp on this one, and I think the old H definition is both incorrect and not particularly useful; you can _really_ see that manifested in the 2013, 2014, 2016 OD benchmarks struggling to come up with a meaningful H that isn’t just another tiny V or W tweak!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronW](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/aaronw/32/49251_2.png) [@AaronW](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/AaronW)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 3:40pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/48 "2019-05-15T15:40:00Z")

</div>

Curious if you’d view the CLYW Borealis as a H Shape?

Hidra (supposed H Shape)

 ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/4/6/1/46198936d56c03b17a6bec99d00e3d594391b9b9.png)

CLYW Borealis (modified organic shape)

 ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/e/3/8/e3843119bd17fd808c2f7ac5949cb21a16cfe7b2.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:00pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/49 "2019-05-15T16:00:11Z")

</div>

> [@AaronW](#):
>
> if you’d view the CLYW Borealis as a H Shape?

> [@E2\_yoyos](#):
>
> Do we consider a “bell shape” yoyo like an H shape? bell is arguably one of the best overall shapes imo

Same thing said here, and I tend to agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronW](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/aaronw/32/49251_2.png) [@AaronW](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/AaronW)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:12pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/50 "2019-05-15T16:12:28Z")

</div>

So you’re just renaming things then?

Why start calling a bell shaped, or modified organic, something that it’s not. There are years of design and naming convention on these. An H has been an H, once bell shapes came into the picture they’ve been called that, or modified organic. It’s like calling a duck a dog, you can do that all you want, but it doesn’t make any sense and doesn’t make it correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:16pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/51 "2019-05-15T16:16:44Z")

</div>

Take it up with iYoYo my friend! How dare they call their yo-yos “a strong H shape” …

Still, the anemic and super _lame_ 2016 benchmark H is a pretty compelling argument in my book that iYoYo is right about this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronW](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/aaronw/32/49251_2.png) [@AaronW](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/AaronW)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/52 "2019-05-15T16:17:44Z")

</div>

Especially when they’re not an H shape :wink:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smileypants707](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/smileypants707/32/19045_2.png) [@smileypants707](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/smileypants707)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:40pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/53 "2019-05-15T16:40:15Z")

</div>

> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> I did not make this up

So, basically what you’re doing here is taking the word of iYoyo over the word of one drop.

One drop claimed that their Benchmark H was an H.

iYoyo claimed that their FiRROX and Hydra are also Hs.

Your approach of relying on the manufacturers definitions is a fallacy, and self-contradictory. _You_ didn’t make this up, but _you_ are manufacturing the problem.

There is no external committee that has come to a unanimous conclusion that what you define a true H, is in fact a true H.

If one companies definition of a shape can be disregarded as untrue just because _you_ disagree, what makes any of them credible?

You’re going to have to find an argument that holds water if you’re going to make this argument at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:48pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/54 "2019-05-15T16:48:47Z")

</div>

> [@smileypants707](#):
>
> If one companies definition of a shape can be disregarded as untrue just because _you_ disagree, what makes any of them credible?

I merely pointed out that **these two manufacturers disagree on the definition of H**. Which manufacturer _you_ agree with is up to you… not me.

As for me, personally:

- I would argue that the more modern definition of H is more correct because it reflects a better understanding of current reality … similar to the way 2020 science (and definitions) are superior to 1920 science (and definitions). We’ve learned more since then.

- playing with the 2016 benchmark H and the 2016 benchmark W is a nearly identical play experience. That’s odd, because the 2016 benchmark O and V and W play quite differently from each other. Now if you substitute that OD benchmark H with an iYoYo H, you achieve a _very different_ play experience. I would argue that this shows the iYoYo definition of H is far more useful in illustrating actual real world play and feel differences between shapes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronW](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/aaronw/32/49251_2.png) [@AaronW](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/AaronW)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:53pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/55 "2019-05-15T16:53:21Z")

</div>

> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> I would argue that this shows the iYoYo definition of H is far more useful

So 1 (newer) company vs. many of the top designers the community has and years of a known definition?

Where then does that leave the bell shape? Or the years of past H shapes? Do we need to redefine all of these based on what you and iyoyo feel?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smileypants707](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/smileypants707/32/19045_2.png) [@smileypants707](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/smileypants707)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 4:56pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/56 "2019-05-15T16:56:34Z")

</div>

Now that’s a reasonable argument.

If I were to personally define an H, it would basically have to look similar to an H (go figure).

So the area of the catch zone directly above the response pads has to move in a fairly exaggerated outward direction from the center of the yoyo; before heading upwards and outwards towards the rims.

Basically, some seriously exaggerated response bumps- giving the profile the appearance of an H.

Now whether a yoyo is a strong H or an H hybrid is another story.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 5:02pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/57 "2019-05-15T17:02:42Z")

</div>

I think “looks like the letter” is a good starting point … but to me the key is “plays meaningfully different due to significant geometry differences”.

Aesthetically I am not sure which “looks” more like the letter H

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/4/9/8/498e8a55790236bbe055a068d820f811983db048.jpeg)

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/f/6/7/f67babcb388fef3480d4f3fa2f24db83a6ca3bfc.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TurdFerguson69](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/turdferguson69/32/45638_2.png) [@TurdFerguson69](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/TurdFerguson69)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 5:09pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/58 "2019-05-15T17:09:09Z")

</div>

I find this whole discussion pretty silly but I am struggling with your definition coding. You say it needs to be inverted organic but then what is the envy? I think the envy is the most clear H shape I have ever seen.

Would an example of each shape be helpful for everyone. Like the most exaggerated example of each?

Also why is it V shaped and not X? Seems some letters signify the whole yoyo while others are just part of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![8bitviet](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/8bitviet/32/42930_2.png) [@8bitviet](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/8bitviet)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 5:34pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/59 "2019-05-15T17:34:10Z")

</div>

Giving this thread a  
[![Surveillance](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/7/d/8/7d885dac879a0c48bab8a46e86c652ac3433842c.jpeg)](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0748/4967/products/Surveillance-PinkGold_1024x1024.jpg?v=1547227325)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TurdFerguson69](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/turdferguson69/32/45638_2.png) [@TurdFerguson69](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/TurdFerguson69)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2019, 5:41pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332/60 "2019-05-15T17:41:46Z")

</div>

Don’t worry everyone I have fixed our very flawed lettering system.  
O doesn’t look like an organic to me thus  
**)-(**

 ![2289399886_58575350b3_b](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/c/e/3/ce3a0ccf94be8d4f5e4178b49292e05f4eb61438.jpeg)

V is no longer v it is X.

X

 ![smn_phenom33](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/9/5/6/956c37820df704ae4db2eef17742cd3c0328ed25.jpeg)  
H shape is great we keep H  
 ![Envy_64_(5)](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/7/4/a/74a2cd816310e9c4ab1d5443a3f83a9415be5cac.jpeg)

W is no longer we have a much better name. The double funnel.

 ![SX425](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/6/f/c/6fcb00430dfe2b723c17b6fd0ecd1cb4bf8424bd.jpeg)  
 ![Benchmark-W-Blue-2_grande](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/uploads/yoyoexpert1/original/4X/5/3/1/531b376359cb7ba196ad26d0989402a5e3bdea66.jpeg)

Imperial is no more. Biased name based off one yoyo. I introduce θ.

I hope this helps everyone.

[Previous page](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/why-is-h-shape-relatively-uncommon-today/302332.md?page=4)
