# i need your guys opinon

**URL:** https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141
**Category:** General Yo-Yo
**Created:** [September 2, 2009, 4:53am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141 "2009-09-02T04:53:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 14
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JRam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b9e5f3/32.png) [@JRam](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/JRam)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 4:53am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/1 "2009-09-02T04:53:00Z")

</div>

on this type of string for 4a  
[http://www.yoyonation.com/product.php?productid=16265&cat=299&page=1](http://www.yoyonation.com/product.php?productid=16265&cat=299&page=1)

I know its long but is it thick enough?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Emptysea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c0e974/32.png) [@Emptysea](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/Emptysea)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 5:19am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/2 "2009-09-02T05:19:46Z")

</div>

I don’t really know I haven’t used them but poly string is usually fairly thin. The type 6-10 usually represents thickness. 10 being the thickest. 6 is like average type string for non loopers. If you believe it to be too think you can go up types. They normally increase in thickness since normally there is more cotton woven into the string. Hope this helps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![AeroSlaYa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AeroSlaYa](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/AeroSlaYa)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 2:11pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/3 "2009-09-02T14:11:10Z")

</div>

Actually the lenngth is the only difference here. this is pure polyester so there i no cotton. the 3x2 is standard thickness that most ppl use and prefer(i do anyways) but if you think it’s 2 thin you go up to type 8 ot type 10. these higher types are thicker and therefor have reponse which is why more advanced players stick with type 6 and stau unresponsive

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yoyomac888](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/c5a1d2/32.png) [@yoyomac888](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/yoyomac888)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 8:27pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/4 "2009-09-02T20:27:10Z")

</div>

aNY STRING LENGTH FOR ME

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dv888](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/dv888/32/215_2.png) [@Dv888](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/Dv888)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 8:44pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/5 "2009-09-02T20:44:26Z")

</div>

> [@yoyomac888](#):
>
> aNY STRING LENGTH FOR ME

Seriously, at least preview your post before you post, this is the second post in 20 seconds that you have used caps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yoyomac888](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/c5a1d2/32.png) [@yoyomac888](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/yoyomac888)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 8:47pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/6 "2009-09-02T20:47:07Z")

</div>

Sorry once again. 😛  
I feel stupid

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ratfacedudeguy](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/ratfacedudeguy/32/273_2.png) [@ratfacedudeguy](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/ratfacedudeguy)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 9:01pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/7 "2009-09-02T21:01:06Z")

</div>

Actually, If I’m not mistaken, type 10 strings are the thinnest of all of those string types, unless that only applies to Brazilian type 10…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![EvanB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/90ced4/32.png) [@EvanB](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/EvanB)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 9:09pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/8 "2009-09-02T21:09:07Z")

</div>

The lower the number, the thinner.

That stuff should work wonders, type 6 is best in my opinion, lot less snaggy. John Narum uses that stuff if I am correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![muchacho](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f475e1/32.png) [@muchacho](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/muchacho)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 9:10pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/9 "2009-09-02T21:10:41Z")

</div>

> [@Evan](#):
>
> The lower the number, the thinner.
> 
> That stuff should work wonders, type 6 is best in my opinion, lot less snaggy. John Narum uses that stuff if I am correct.

correct u are

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Apetrunk](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/apetrunk/32/148_2.png) [@Apetrunk](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/Apetrunk)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 9:20pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/10 "2009-09-02T21:20:27Z")

</div>

> [@ratfacedudeguy](#):
>
> Actually, If I’m not mistaken, type 10 strings are the thinnest of all of those string types, unless that only applies to Brazilian type 10…

You would be correct. Type 10 is thinner than type 9 and type 9 is thinner than type 6. 8 is thicker than 6.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yoyomac888](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/c5a1d2/32.png) [@yoyomac888](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/yoyomac888)
#### Post date: [September 2, 2009, 9:46pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/11 "2009-09-02T21:46:30Z")

</div>

> [@Apetrunk](#):
>
> > [@ratfacedudeguy](#):
> >
> > Actually, If I’m not mistaken, type 10 strings are the thinnest of all of those string types, unless that only applies to Brazilian type 10…
> 
> You would be correct. Type 10 is thinner than type 9 and type 9 is thinner than type 6. 8 is thicker than 6.

Sorry for going of subject but your sig is just toooo awsome!!! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ewski](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/848f3c/32.png) [@Ewski](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/Ewski)
#### Post date: [September 3, 2009, 2:02am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/12 "2009-09-03T02:02:06Z")

</div>

> [@yoyomac888](#):
>
> > [@Apetrunk](#):
> >
> > > [@ratfacedudeguy](#):
> > >
> > > Actually, If I’m not mistaken, type 10 strings are the thinnest of all of those string types, unless that only applies to Brazilian type 10…
> > 
> > You would be correct. Type 10 is thinner than type 9 and type 9 is thinner than type 6. 8 is thicker than 6.
> 
> Sorry for going of subject but your sig is just toooo awsome!!! 😃

So is the string ;D

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yoyomaster242](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/yoyomaster242/32/64_2.png) [@yoyomaster242](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/yoyomaster242)
#### Post date: [September 3, 2009, 2:07am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/13 "2009-09-03T02:07:48Z")

</div>

> [@Ewski](#):
>
> > [@yoyomac888](#):
> >
> > > [@Apetrunk](#):
> > >
> > > > [@ratfacedudeguy](#):
> > > >
> > > > Actually, If I’m not mistaken, type 10 strings are the thinnest of all of those string types, unless that only applies to Brazilian type 10…
> > > 
> > > You would be correct. Type 10 is thinner than type 9 and type 9 is thinner than type 6. 8 is thicker than 6.
> > 
> > Sorry for going of subject but your sig is just toooo awsome!!! 😃
> 
> So is the string ;D

;D

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Paolo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/6f9a4e/32.png) [@Paolo](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/Paolo)
#### Post date: [September 3, 2009, 2:10am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/i-need-your-guys-opinon/6141/14 "2009-09-03T02:10:05Z")

</div>

Yes, type 10 is the thinnest.

In my opinion, it is perfect for offstring. Thin, but not so thin that its hard to bind.
