# A bst psa. :)

**URL:** <https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/a-bst-psa/295613>\
**Category:** General Yo-Yo\
**Created:** [November 28, 2018, 1:41am UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/a-bst-psa/295613 "2018-11-28T01:41:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forums.yoyoexpert.com/codinghorror/32/8052_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2018, 10:59pm UTC](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/a-bst-psa/295613/23 "2018-11-28T22:59:47Z")

</div>

> [@vegabomb](#):
>
> Little dramatic ya think? 🤣

No, actually, I don’t…

> [@FT: Entire Collection](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/ft-entire-collection/294954/26):
>
> Bump Hey guys if you have any questions or offers please pm me as I don’t wanna break any rules by talking on this post. Also: the Grail is green and the quail is red ok_hand

> [@vegabomb](#):
>
> Conversation in the threads _does_ defeat the bump rule… to some degree. Wether or not that’s a problem is I suppose debatable.

I fully support intervening in those specific cases versus an over-broad general rule that a) isn’t necessary based on today’s forum and b) has damaging follow-on effects to relevant & meaningful conversations.

I am sure things were different in 2008 and 2003, but here in 2018… I just can’t see that rule making sense, and it’s kinda harmful to boot.

> [@AaronW](#):
>
> I’ve referenced other forums that I frequent and they’ve all gone to a format that when you comment in a BST thread that post is not bumped. You have to use the “Up Thread” button to actually bump the thread, and then it doesn’t allow another bump for 24 hours. That allows legitimate discussion to take place, sometimes it is necessary in the thread I feel.

Another interesting idea, but honestly more of a “nice to have” than a requirement from my perspective.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.yoyoexpert.com/t/a-bst-psa/295613)._
